project:sdr:tetra:sniffutils
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
project:sdr:tetra:sniffutils [2016/12/26 05:26] – created jenda | project:sdr:tetra:sniffutils [2016/12/26 05:35] (current) – [retune.sh] jenda | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
(the directory is the one that contains the .cdata.bz2 files) | (the directory is the one that contains the .cdata.bz2 files) | ||
+ | ==== retune.sh ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | retune.sh checks on which channels there was no traffic in the last 4 days. It then replaces these channels with other channels that have the best signal. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Example: | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | $ bash retune.sh localhost 3333 21, | ||
+ | Obtaining list of sniffed data frames, this may take a while... | ||
+ | FDMA scan... 10%... 20%... 30%... 40%... 50%... 60%... 70%... 80%... 90%... 100%... | ||
+ | 21 (chan id 0) is OK | ||
+ | 22 (chan id 1) is OK | ||
+ | 20 (chan id 2) is OK | ||
+ | 28 (chan id 3) is OK | ||
+ | 41 (chan id 4) is OK | ||
+ | 27 (chan id 5) is not OK | ||
+ | 21 has good SNR, but we are already sniffing it | ||
+ | 41 has good SNR, but we are already sniffing it | ||
+ | 20 has good SNR, but we are already sniffing it | ||
+ | 28 has good SNR, but we are already sniffing it | ||
+ | 25 has good SNR, but we are already sniffing it | ||
+ | 6 has good SNR, but we are already sniffing it | ||
+ | 40 has good SNR, but we are already sniffing it | ||
+ | chosen 51 instead. | ||
+ | 6 (chan id 6) is OK | ||
+ | 25 (chan id 7) is OK | ||
+ | 9 (chan id 8) is not OK | ||
+ | chosen 58 instead. | ||
+ | 40 (chan id 9) is OK | ||
+ | Old FCL string: 21, | ||
+ | New FCL string: 21, | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The last parameter, demodulator offset, should be 30 for your second SDR (tetra2.py). (yes, we know that this is a terrible hack) | ||
==== run.sh ==== | ==== run.sh ==== | ||
project/sdr/tetra/sniffutils.1482730011.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/12/26 05:26 by jenda